I tried to make a workout for running. But i don t have the same FTP in cycling as running … so the power zone are false … I think it ll be a great feature to introduce CP(critical power) for running and specific power zone for running .
What do you think about This ?
I use Stryd for running and unfortunately Strava strips out running power. Since up to this week the majority of data are coming to I.I from Strava you get the point in not having running power here.
I find useful planning my running workouts through the Intervals. I define them eyeballing the percentages of FTP to estimate the load. I pay no attention to the exact watts shown. And it turns out that the estimate is always spot on!
A way to get power data on i.i when you recorded your run with a garmin watch, is to download the fit file from the Stryd Powercenter and then upload it to i.i via the new upload button
I record using my Garmin Watch and Stryd Powercenter is synced with Garmin. I see slight differences in datas some maybe Stryd is doing its own cuisine there. Then I download the fit from Stryd Powercenter and upload to i.i.
i.i doesn’t natively manage power with running at this time I think
I have a Polar Vantage V watch and it records running power. Polar Flow syncs the run file to Strava and then into I.ICU. The power data does seem to be there.
It would be useful if I.ICU did some analysis with the power data from runs. Not too worried about FTP etc but measures of run efficiency eg Avg HR/ Avg Power and aerobic decoupling would be good.
I have running power on the todo list. It will show up now on the timeline chart as you have seen but thats as far as it goes. I need to do quite a bit of work to make sure it doesn’t get mixed up with cycling power.
+1 on the feature request, for sure it would be great addition!
I found my HRSS / TRIMP calculated load for running is way too low vs. cycling equivalent, even if I trust my resting HR, threshold and max HR based on last 12months of data and testing.
For example, a 2 hr ride 134 load, while 1h36m run merely 71.
I trust this is correct for the model, but still believe not apples to apples comparison vs. power based.
The risk is underestimate the impact of running and get ill by overdoing (like I did 3 weeks ago :))
Looking at single activities I can see my Stryd pod power data, but when I look at things like the all activities list, none of the available power columns are populated for runs and when I look at the fitness chart and mouse over a run, things like Normalized Power and FTP show as ? rather than any data