I just noticed that on my Power v HR ‘Compare’ graph, when I filter outdoor rides only the 2020 line disappears - as if there was no outdoor data.
This is a bit odd, as the 2020 Indoor/Outdoor graph is different to the Indoor only one, so there is clearly Outdoor data in there. I also did a lot of outdoor riding in 2020 so I know the data exists!
It is possible to look at increasing fitness over years by Efficiency factor (EF). Thats normalized power/HR. But dont look at to short period. It gives you wrong numbers. For example, you cant compare base miles period on flat terrain (for example January) vs July with a lot of races or a holiday in the mountains. When your NP and avg power or higher, the EF will automatic also higher.
I have in golden cheetah a chart for the last 3 years. It gives me nice insight about my aerobic fitness. You can see that the lowest and highest points increased…so it is possible to compare every single month with the other years, in order to prevent comparing appels and orange.
You can plot this on the /fitness page using a custom chart. It doesn’t have the trend line however.
You could also look at Power/HR which gets ride of the NP skew from hard rides. There is also “Power/HR Z2” which is only from zone 2 data and has lots of cleanup done (HR lag adjusted, minutes with coasting thrown out etc.).
I consider the idea behind this graph very powerful: Looking at the HR-Power relationship as an indicator for progress !
I am wondering however why you choose to plot the maximum HR for a specific power-bin. (Rather than average HR, median HR, 90% percentile HR,…)
I would think that the maximum is highly likely to be an outlier (for example if it turns out to be the minute after a very hard short effort or at the end of an exhausting ride, … )
It doesn’t use the max HR but the average HR for each bucket.
Each ride has a power vs HR curve created by breaking the ride up into 1 minute segments, adjusting for HR lag and calculating average power and HR for each segments. These are the data points used for the decoupling related charts on the activity power page. Only segments with 100% moving time are kept.
The traces for the comparison chart are created by bucketing the power-HR segments for all matching activities into power buckets and averaging the HR.
I’m totally fine with the current axes, but I’d like an option to compare HR at given power.
So in pop-up I could see two datapoints with the same power (x) value but different heartrate (y) values.
I’m back looking at data after a long break, and really like this chart, and many of the other changes that have been made.
I’m seeing some weird data in mine, and from looking at the activity that seems to be causing it I don’t see anything obviously wrong with the data. I found the ‘bad’ ride by changing the date range until I found a change that would have or not have the drop at 260 watts.
How can I go about confirming that the workout in question (Feb 19th) is really the problem, and what could be wrong with the data?
edit - Also another question regarding how multiple rides from a time period are agragated - is this the average for all rides? (ie something like all 1 min buckets of 160 watts averaged for time adjusted HR) When I increase the time period to 1 year as above what does that mean?