I hour zone 2 endurance ride

Hi guys,what power target should you be aiming for in a 1 hour indoor endurance ride
Top end zone 2
Mid point zone 2
Let dha alpha 1 dictate the power.
Thanks Glenn

1 Like

Bigger question to be answered here first - where does this fit into your overall plan and what is the purpose of this specific workout?

1 Like

Using Heart rate, breathing and feel would be better that power. As you get fitter, you will produce more power for the same heart rate, breathing rate and feel.

  • Keep you heart rate in zone 2 (temperature, hydration, outside stress, caffeine all affect this);
  • Keep your breathing easy (should be able to talk without gasping for breath);
  • Should feel easy (about 3-4 on a 10-point scale for RPE).
4 Likes

Hi Olly,currently I am doing about 8- 10 hours per zone 2 riding,every 10 days I wud swap out a 1 hour endurance ride for a vo2 max session,my main aim is to increase power @ LT1 as I have entered the Mallorca 312 April 2024.

1 Like

Hi Gerald,my zone2 heart according to intervals is 136-150 bpm,where abouts in that range should I target my 1hour zone 2 rides.

Zones are a continuum @Glenn_Crawford and you donā€™t just switch from one to another in an instant.
So if youā€™re targeting a HR of 150 your session is probably going to be as much Z2 and it is Z3.
But how strong is your aerobic base? Thatā€™s a key question youā€™ll have to ask yourself. If it needs work then Iā€™d be more inclined to focus on top Z1/bottom Z2 for your endurance rides. As @Gerald says there - let RPE dictate your intensity. The lungs donā€™t lie :wink:

1 Like

Thanks for all the advice guysšŸ‘

For the number of hours per week, your Z2 rides should all be at least 80min to get more benefit. 60min is too short for 8-10 hours a week of training and will have very little positive effect. Do one really long one and some more around 90min.

2 Likes

Another quote from Alan Couzens:
Ā“itĀ“s almost impossible to go to slowĀ“ ā€¦
The vast majority of non-proĀ“s do their endurance rides at an Intensity that is too high.

2 Likes

Sorry, I thought I had replied, got sidetracked and then saw the draft when returning. You have already received a few responses, so my response below is what I originally typed before the subsequent replies between your reply and this post. Here it isā€¦

Trial and error; start at the middle of the range, and see how you feel. If out of breath at any point, you know it was/is too hard. Ease up.

Not sure what your maxHR is, or how youā€™re setting your zones (LTHR or maxHR), but 136-150 bpm could be too high for zone 2, based purely on the many athletes (and coaches) I have seen or heard from. It depends though, on each individual, their age and fitness level. FWIW, my upper limit that I cap my endurance rides at, is 136bpm. Itā€™s not something to compare with others, but rather something to keep in mind (err on the side of lower is better).

1 Like

What are your thoughts on becoming a good nose breather? Asking for a friend. :sweat_smile:

Thereā€™s a little more to breathing, or rather a lot more.

  1. Ride slower
  2. Practice
  3. Google it, but be cautious
  4. Hereā€™s a start:
    Understanding and Training Your Breathing with Dr. Stephen Cheung and Steve Neal - Fast Talk Laboratories

Iā€™ve meant Iā€™m already a good nose breather (previously I misinterpreted my thoughts) and when I run, I can sustain the nose breathing well above my Z2. Thatā€™s something also Peter Attia once mentioned, when doing his Z2 rides, that he canā€™t trust himself only based on his (nose) breathing to still be in Z2.

I recently set a similar goal for my 4x week rides in 1 hour Zone 2 rides as defined in some videos I watched from Peter Attia

He defines Zone2, using lactose blood levels. I came across some info in his video where he gives an estimated way to figure out zone 2 without the use of a lactose meter.

0.80(220-age)

80% of HR max determined using the 220-age standard estimate.

He and in his interview with san-millan recommend 45min minimum in this zone 4 or more times per week. Ideally shooting for 1.5 hours if possible.

Have you a link to that video please?

Oops, I thought I linked it

Itā€™s around 1h40min or so where they they talk about getting close to zone 2 without a blood lactose meter. Attia mentions needing to know the real maxHR, then working with 70 to 80% of that to estimate being in Zone 2

I started by using the standard formula to estimate maxHR, and should be an okay starting point unless there is some medical conditions outside the normal
Iā€™ll be going with that for now and the foreseeable future until I can either get tested, which I donā€™t know if my insurance would even cover a voluntary test like that. Or maybe some day, if I stick with it for a year or so, get a blood lactose meter myself. But there around $350 then thereā€™s single use test strips to buy depending on how 9ften one would want to test.

The entire interview good and very informative. Worth a watch. I had to split it up over three days. And this morning watched it for an hour while doing my zone 2 ride before work.

Ah. That makes more sense. Thatā€™s not using 220-age.
My 220-age is 20 beats lower than my max. Itā€™s not a useful starting point at all tbh.

2 Likes

Yeah. Iā€™m going on the high end also. But still used the estimated maxHR formula to figure that out., Since I have no real number from any form of testing to base it on.

Iā€™m sticking as close as possible to 80%( of that 70-80 percent range of maxHR he talked about ā€˜prescribingā€™ his patients) the entire zone 2 workout, because I also feel my true max HR is higher than 220-age. So, I think itā€™s a very useful starting point for those that do not have proof from a test of our actual maxHR. Then we can adjust as needed. They also talk about other aspects of how we should feel at the peak of zone 2.

I just figured it was the simplest method to get into zone 2, for all the lactose benefits they talk about in that video without having the tests done.

I know I heard it in another video of his, or maybe it was also in this one where he mentioned 220-age standard estimate not being the most accurate, but can get in the ballpark.

Iā€™ve been using the ā€œMaffetoneā€ Method which is something like 220-age and then you add or minus some beats based on some conditions. Been using that for some time ever since I found success (albeit in running). So Now been using that to do my indoor session based on HR instead of Power.

After that, I just input it into the workout app and let it control the power. I think it helps. Tho at times Iā€™ve been wondering if I should lower it down further to like 60% or 70% instead and get more towards Z1.

1 Like