Zones of "Form %" in Fitness-Chart

Hello!

i am wondering about Zone definitions (Transition, Fresh, Grey, Optimal, High Risk). In the fitness chart, they are based on the relative Form/TSB (Form %), while the linked reference defines them based on the absolut TSB: Managing Training Using TSB | Joe Friel (TSB = CLT - ALT)

For me (starting again training after long covid, so very low fitness arround 20), this makes now large difference for the “high risk” zone:

Taking Joe Friels Definition, it is ok to go up to -30 TSB. So for my fitness of 20, i could train now with an ATL up to 50 to avoid the high risk zone.

If i take the definition from the fitness chart, then the high risk zone is defined from -30% if relative Form/TSB. So my relative TSB should be no below -30%. This would mean that i should train now only with maximum ALT of 26 ? (20 + 0.3*20 = 26).

Is there any scientific litereture for this “retlative definition” of these zones? Or where does this come from?

Thanks a lot!
David

1 Like

The zones come from Joe Friel and are for absolute TSB. I stuck with the same zones for % TSB because for myself doing approx 70 TSS/day they seem to work well whereas the absolute did not + I assumed the absolute zones were likely for someone doing 100 TSS/day so straight % seemed ok. You can switch to absolute form and see how that works.

I think TSB zones are more of a “rule of thumb” than science. I am 49 so I will take longer to recover from training that someone in their 20s and that isn’t factored in.

2 Likes

If you know for sure that you take longer to recover, you should modify the “Fatigue Days”. That is the purpose of that number, but I haven’t found anything yet that explains what and how.