Incorrect structured workout rendering in calendar export

Bug Reports
1

Hi there. When I create a structured interval workout in the editor, then close it, what’s rendered in the view is different (enhanced?) than what I literally wrote, and the exported note to my Google Calendar is somewhat nonsensical.

Here is what I created in the workout editor:

Warmup:
- 2mi @ Z1 HR

2x Intervals:
- Work 6m @ 92-96% LTHR
- Recover 1m

Cooldown:
- 2mi @ Z1 HR

When I close the editor, I see this:

Warmup:

2mi @ Z1 HR (83-104bpm)
2x Intervals:

Work 6m @ 92-96% LTHR (120-125bpm)
Recover 1m
Cooldown:

2mi @ Z1 HR (83-104bpm)

Note the added bpm ranges in the rendered text, which is a nice touch. In fact (feature request?), it would be nice to be able to specify bpm ranges in the editor, but I couldn’t get that to work.

But now, in my Google Calendar entry (via the exported workout calendar), I see this is the description text:

Warmup:
- 2mi @ Z1 HR

2x Intervals:
- Work 6m @ 221-230w LTHR
- Recover 1m

Cooldown:
- 2mi @ Z1 HR

39 training load

The line Work 6m @ 221-230w LTHR is non-sensical, no? What is 221-230w LTHR?

(My suggestion would be to have the calendar entry note include the raw workout note text verbatim…)

Thanks very much!
Carey

2

Removed my answer because at first I didn’t notice that the problem was in the calendar export.
Sorry bout that…

3

No worries. Thanks for pointing me to the guide. I’d read the initial guide post, but it was incomplete.

I did not find any mention of bpm syntax specifications, though. Searching for “bpm” turned up nothing. I tried specifications like “120bpm” and “110-120bpm”, but they didn’t work. The editor tells you, in a sense, if your syntax is correct, because the graph at the bottom will immediately go from blank to filled in.

4

You are absolutely right. HR is only available as a % of HRmax, % of LTHR or as Zone.
Power can be specified by absolute numbers but HR not.

I suspect that the calendar export is not correctly interpreting % LTHR and just takes the power percentages as target. If 221W - 230W correspond to 92% FTP and 96% FTP, that would confirm my suspicion. (Your FTP then being 240W).