Estimated VO2 Max

Hi all,

New to intervals.icu and, familiar with the elementary knowledge of the training basics behind it (Coggin/Friels; Golden Cheetah, TrainerRoad/TrainingPeaks etc), so I am completely blown away by how awesome the layout and user experience is!
So well done - thank you David!

I see there is info about the calculation of eFTP and all that accords with what I’m expecting.

Is there a VO2Max estimation?

I used to have a track on that in GC and/or via Garmin Connect but I’m only riding inside now, so not using the Garmin to record activities.

Not sure of the full details of this estimation but I know for example a recent ride I did recorded a 5min interval at 131% of FTP (one of the TrainerRoad power test protocols) and subsequently Intervals has estimated my FTP a fair bit higher but I am wanting to understand my maximal aerobic capacity a bit better as i expected for 5min 120% would be pretty tough to complete (albeit this would usually be for repeats I guess, not an all out 5min effort)

Anyway I’d love to discuss this aspect here if people can help me build my knowledge on super threshold work.

I’m doing a build phase (sustained power build) at the moment.

Stay well everyone in these crazy times!

Will

2 Likes

Thanks! There isn’t VO2Max estimation yet. I have looked into it a bit but haven’t got as far as figuring out how to implement anything. It is on the list!

3 Likes

VO2 max estimation is actually of limited use in my opinion. My Garmin has consistently overestimated it for me as I have a comparatively strong anaerobic metabolism and it cheats the algorithm so to speak. Got tested in a lab ang got 71 ml/kg*min, whereas Garmin says 79 :smiley:
Your maximal performance for 5 minutes may very well be different from those 120% of FTP depending on your metabolism, especially on an all-out effort.

3 Likes

Thank you both! I found a paper that posits a simple formula that puts me at 56.2 by:
(6min power x 10.8)/weight + 7
This seems to under estimate vs Garmin (my brother’s Garmin says 69 and this calculates 62 for him).
I understand it is probably of limited use but as another number to monitor after focus on these types of intervals in training it is something.
All good - thanks for the info, very enlightening.

That formula seems more like a ‘220 - age’ for max hr to me. If you really want to know your vo2max, you should do a lab test.

And even then, it’s dependent on your form of the day, because it is typically tested over a 12-15 minute period. Your 6 minute power is not a good reference point.

Other than that, while it may be a metric you want to look at, it’s less tangible and therefor less useful than for instance ftp.

1 Like

understood. Good analogy. Thanks for the reply.
For the record here is the source of the formula I found.
https://www.michael-konczer.com/en/training/calculators/calculate-vo2max

@david
Is it possible to implement this test in intervals.icu? It’s easy to count by hand, but it can be an interesting option.

Thanks! Would need to detect a step test for that :slight_smile:

At the beginning you can do so that the user would check the box “This is a step test” :slight_smile:

I am familiar with that source :slight_smile: Also, there are similar sites where you can calculate your bmi, an equally less meaningful, or rather less trustworthy, metric :sunglasses:

If you really want to know your vo2max, you should do a lab test.

Yes but in any case it often varies and therefore it remains “approximate” (but always better than via theory.)
For VO² that it is overestimated by Garmin (and undoubtedly underestimated by Golden Cheetah) is not really important, what is interesting is to see when it goes up :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Agreed. If you can put it into a formula and then make the test circumstances the same every time, it would be something to use. Actually, same goes for FTP - you can never be really sure that the circumstances are the same. The lab setup yes, but yourself? And this is why I never test FTP :joy: (I believe in Xert, albeit that that also has tweaking issues.)

Is this implemented?

Nope.