# API integration with ChatGPT

**URL:** <https://forum.intervals.icu/t/api-integration-with-chatgpt/108560>\
**Category:** Feature Requests\
**Created:** [3 July 2025 16:06 UTC](https://forum.intervals.icu/t/api-integration-with-chatgpt/108560 "2025-07-03T16:06:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 95

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yokuha](https://forum.intervals.icu/user_avatar/forum.intervals.icu/yokuha/32/29661_2.png) [@yokuha](https://forum.intervals.icu/u/yokuha)\
**Post date:** [14 December 2025 07:56 UTC](https://forum.intervals.icu/t/api-integration-with-chatgpt/108560/95 "2025-12-14T07:56:33Z")

</div>

> [@TrainerDay\_Alex](#):
>
> But as we get feedback we will improve it.

Hi @TrainerDay_Alex , interesting! Haven’t been on your site for too long:-o (too busy:-o)

What’s your take on connecting it directly to i.icu. Focusing on the “coaching” not the UI? 😉

> [@The AI coach we (self-coached athletes) want](https://forum.intervals.icu/t/the-ai-coach-we-self-coached-athletes-want/116591):
>
> Recently, there were significant pushes for leveraging general AI/LLM approaches to support or “replace” coaches and they have clearly provided interesting are aspects into training and coaches. However, they typically try to build a complete new training/coaching ecosystem (atheltica.ai, AI endurance, …) or update their existing ones to leverage AI (TrainerRoad, etc.). To me, this is the wrong approach. The GUIs and visuals of these training platforms always fly short of i.icu in terms of data…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.intervals.icu/t/api-integration-with-chatgpt/108560)._
